green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: L.T.
App. 702, 706 , 214 S.E.2d 626, 628 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665 (1975); and (3) the minor’s right to procedural due process, see id. at 707, 214 S.E.2d at 629 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: N.J.
App. 702, 706 , 214 S.E.2d 626, 628 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665 (1975); and (3) the minor’s right to procedural due process, see id. at 707, 214 S.E.2d at 629 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: R.J.
App. 702, 706 , 214 S.E.2d 626, 628 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665 (1975); and (3) the minor’s right to procedural due process, see id. at 707, 214 S.E.2d at 629 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: P.S.
App. 702, 706 , 214 S.E.2d 626, 628 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665 (1975); and (3) the minor’s right to procedural due process, see id. at 707, 214 S.E.2d at 629 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William KNUCKLES and Corinthea Richardson
v.
Beatrice SPAUGH et al.
v.
Beatrice SPAUGH et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 25, 1975.
Published
Gerald C. Kell, for plaintiffs.
Hatfield & Allman, Deal, Hutchins & Minor, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 26 N.C.App. 340, 215 S.E.2d 825. Denied.