green
Positive treatment
22.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wayne Palmore v. Travis Day, Et Al.
Here, Palmore’s claim does not implicate the right to access of courts as “the Supreme Court has not extended this right to encompass more than the ability of an inmate to prepare and transmit a necessary legal document to a court.” Vaccaro v. United States, 125 F.3d 852 , 1997 WL 574977, at *1 (5th Cir. 1997) (quotation omitted) (emphasis added); accord Manning v. Sumlin, 540 F. App’x 462, 463 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 356 (1996); Brewer v. Wilkinson, 3 F.3d 816, 821 (5th Cir. 1993)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gregory Reginald Jynes v. Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office, et al.
“While the precise contours of a prisoner’s right of access to the courts remain somewhat obscure, the Supreme Court has not extended this right to encompass more than the ability of an inmate to prepare and transmit a necessary legal document to a court.” Vaccaro v. United States, 125 F.3d 852 , 1997 WL 574977, at *1 (5th Cir. 1997) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael Alexander Young v. District Attorney’s Office of New Orleans, Jason Williams, the Orleans Justice Center Administration Legal Department, Ms. Fairley, and Ms. Delahoussaye
“While the precise contours of a prisoner’s right of access to the courts remain somewhat obscure, the Supreme Court has not extended this right to encompass more than the ability of an inmate to prepare and transmit a necessary legal document to a court.” Vaccaro v. United States, 125 F.3d 852 , 1997 WL 574977, at *1 (5th Cir. 1997) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brian Washington v. Carson, et al.
Further, “[w]hile the precise contours of a prisoner’s right of access to the courts remain somewhat obscure, the Supreme Court has not extended this right to encompass more than the ability of an inmate to prepare and transmit a necessary legal document to a court.” Vaccaro v. United States, 125 F.3d 852 , 1997 WL 574977, at *1 (5th Cir. 1997) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Holder v. Cooley
"While the precise contours of a prisoner's right of access to the courts remain somewhat obscure, the Supreme Court has not extended this right to encompass more than the ability of an inmate to prepare and transmit a necessary legal document to a court." Vaccaro v. United States, 125 F.3d 852 [published in full-text format at 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 42321 ], 1997 WL 574977, at *1 (5th Cir. 1997) (quotation omitted) (emphasis added); accord Manning v. Sumlin, 540 F. App'x 462, 463 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing Lewis v. Casey, 116 S. Ct. 2174, 2182 (1996); Brewer v. Wilkinson, 3 F.3d 816, 821 (5th Cir.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vaccaro
v.
U.S
v.
U.S
96-60838.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 29, 1997.
Unpublished
Vaccaro
v.
U.S.[*]
NO. 96-60838
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug 28, 1997
Appeal From: S.D.Miss. ,No.1:96CV7RR
1
Affirmed.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2