green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Torres
See, e.g., United States v. Mansoori, 304 F.3d 635, 652-54 (7th Cir.2002) (recognizing gang expert testimony regarding history, leadership and operations of particular gang helpful to jurors), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 967 , 123 S.Ct. 1761 , 155 L.Ed.2d 522 (2003); United States v. Lemon, 239 F.3d 968, 971 (8th Cir.2001) (admitting gang expert testimony on defendant’s admitted gang membership); United States v. Hankey, 203 F.3d 1160, 1168-69 (9th Cir.)(noting gang expert testimony relevant and reliable based on expert’s twenty-one years experience as police officer, including undercover gang …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perea-Santana
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-9286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 2003.
Published
PEREA-SANTANA
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-9286.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 7, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 37 Fed. Appx. 926.