Jianrong Chen v. City of New York, New York, 538 U.S. 979 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Jianrong Chen v. City of New York, New York, 538 U.S. 979 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clifton McFowler v. Danny D. Jaimet, Warden, Hill Correctional Center (ca7, 2003-11-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clifton McFowler v. Danny D. Jaimet, Warden, Hill Correctional Center
7th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
A state court decision is unreasonable for purposes of section 2254(d)(1) if its application of Supreme Court precedent “l[ies] well outside the boundaries of permissible differences of opinion.” Id. at 762, citing Williams, 529 U.S. at 411 , 120 S.Ct. at 1522 ; see also Visciotti, 123 S.Ct. at 361 (“[t]he federal habeas scheme ... authorizes federal-court intervention only when a state-court decision is objectively unreasonable”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jianrong Chen
v.
City of New York, New York
02-1217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2003.
538 U.S. 979
Published

538 U.S. 979

JIANRONG CHEN
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, ET AL.

No. 02-1217.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 21, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 51 Fed. Appx. 352.