green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pettit v. New Mexico
See Lundahl v. Zimmer, 296 F.3d 936, 938-39 (10th Cir.2002)(holding dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction “necessarily rendered moot [plaintiffs] request for an order requiring the entry of ... a default judgment”), ce rt. denied, 538 U.S. 983 , 123 S.Ct. 1797 , 155 L.Ed.2d 675 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atkinson-Bird v. State of Utah
See Lundahl v. Zimmer, 296 F.3d 936, 938-39 (10th Cir.2002) *648 (holding dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction “necessarily rendered moot [plaintiffs] request for an order requiring the entry of ... a default judgment”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 983 , 123 S.Ct. 1797 , 155 L.Ed.2d 675 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schroeder v. Kochanowski
See also Lundahl v. Zimmer, 296 F.3d 936, 939 (10th Cir.2002) (quoting Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-57 , 98 S.Ct. 1099 , 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 983 , 155 L.Ed.2d 675 , 123 S.Ct. 1797 (2003)("Except where a judge has acted 'in the clear absence of all jurisdiction,' the doctrine of judicial immunity shields that judge from liability for the judge’s official adjudicative acts.”) 58 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Slaughter
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
02-8995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2003.
Published
SLAUGHTER
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 02-8995.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 21, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.