green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2011 ·
…plaintiffs activities regarding the veterans preference are not protected rights under title vii, thus he cannot establish a prima facie case of retaliation based on those activities.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oluyomi v. Napolitano
(2×)
plaintiffs activities regarding the veterans preference are not protected rights under title vii, thus he cannot establish a prima facie case of retaliation based on those activities.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. McKnight
(3×)
See Coloian v. United States, 552 U.S. 948 , 128 S.Ct. 377 , 169 L.Ed.2d 260 (2007) (mem.), denying cert. to 480 F.3d 47 (1st Cir.2007); Rowlands v. United States, 549 U.S. 1032 , 127 S.Ct. 598 , 166 L.Ed.2d 431 (2006) (mem.), denying cert. to 451 F.3d 173 (3d Cir.2006); Schnitzer v. United States, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978), denying cert. to 567 F.2d 536 (2d Cir.1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Garza v. Thaler
(2×)
See Sonnier v. Quarterman, 476 F.3d 349, 365-67 (5th Cir.2007) (recognizing the Texas capital sentencing scheme, like the one upheld by the Supreme Court in Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 , 126 S.Ct. 2516 , 165 L.Ed.2d 429 (2006), performs the constitutionally-required narrowing function through its statutory definition of capital murder and further narrows the category of those eligible for the death penalty by requiring an additional fact finding, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is a probability the defendant will commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threa…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
(2×)
See Kirkendall v. Dep’t of the Army, 479 F.3d 830 , 844 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 948 , 128 S.Ct. 375 , 169 L.Ed.2d 260 (2007).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitchell
(3×)
See Coloian v. United States, 552 U.S. 948 , 128 S.Ct. 377 , 169 L.Ed.2d 260 (2007) (mem.), denying cert. to 480 F.3d 47 (1st Cir.2007) (finding no jurisdiction); Rowlands v. United States, 549 U.S. 1032 , 127 S.Ct. 598 , 166 L.Ed.2d 431 (2006) (mem.), denying cert. to 451 F.3d 173 (3d Cir.2006) (same). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
See Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 276 , 96 S.Ct. 2950 , 49 L.Ed.2d 929 (1976); see also Sonnier v. Quarterman, 476 F.3d 349, 366-67 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 948 , 128 S.Ct. 374 , 169 L.Ed.2d 259 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Normandy Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
(2×)
Compare N. Cal. River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, 496 F.3d 993, 999-1000 (9th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1225 , 170 L.Ed.2d 61 (2008) (holding that Justice Kennedy’s test provides the controlling rule for determining jurisdiction) with U.S. v. Johnson, 467 F.3d 56, 60-66 (1st Cir.2006), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 948 , 128 S.Ct. 375 , 169 L.Ed.2d 260 (2007) (holding that jurisdiction exists if either the plurality’s test or Kennedy’s test is met).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
First, as the language of Rule 26(b)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil *87 Procedure indicates, “[mjaterials assembled during routine investigation by counsel do not receive the qualified immunity afforded an attorney’s work product.” 10 Federal Procedure: Lawyers Edition § 26:184, at 573 (2007); see also United States v. Fort, 472 F.3d 1106 , 1118 n. 13 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 5.Ct. 375, 169 L.Ed.2d 260 (2007); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 318 F.3d 379 , 384-85 (2d Cir.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Artin H. COLOIAN, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
07-72.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 2007.
Cited by 27 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.