green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Farnsworth
See Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1182 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Dittmeyer v. Whetsel
See Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1182 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky v. McCreary County, Kentucky
(2×)
See id.
cited
Cited "see"
Gross v. Koury
See Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1182 (10th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glassroth v. Moore
See Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2002) (returning a large, granite Ten Commandments monument from storage to a prominent position on the capitol grounds would violate the Establishment Clause), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 1909 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003); Ind. Civil Liberties Union v. O'Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2001) (erecting a seven-foot tall, 11,500-pound limestone monument, one side of which contained the Ten Commandments, on statehouse grounds would violate the Establishment Clause) cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002); Books v. City o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Glassroth v. Moore
See Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2002) (returning a large, granite Ten Commandments monument from storage to a prominent position on the capítol grounds would violate the Establishment Clause), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1909 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003); Ind. Civil Liberties Union v. O’Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2001) (erecting a seven-foot tall, 11,-500-pound limestone monument, one side of which contained the Ten Commandments, on statehouse grounds would violate the Establishment Clause) cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002); Books v. City o…
cited
Cited "see"
Reid v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board
See Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1181 (10th Cir.2002), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Stryker Corp.
“However, conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions will not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss.” Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, 987 F.2d 278, 284 (5th Cir.1993); see also Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1181 (10th Cir.2002) (“All well-pleaded facts, as distinguished from conclusory allegations, must be taken as true.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Water Supply and Storage Co.
“However, conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions will not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss.” Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, 987 F.2d 278 , *1150 284 (5th Cir.1998); see also Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1181 (10th Cir. 2002) (“All well-pleaded facts, as distinguished from conclusory allegations, must be taken as true.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rocky Mountain Christian Church v. Board of County Commissioners
“However, conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions will not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss.” Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, 987 F.2d 278, 284 (5th Cir.1993); see also Ruiz v. McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1181 (10th Cir.2002) (“All well-pleaded facts, as distinguished from eonclusory allegations, must be taken as true.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1908 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lambeth v. Board of Commissioners of Davidson County
See Mellen, 327 F.3d at 371 (noting the special problem of government coercion to religious worship inherent in school prayer cases and consequently deciding to treat the endorsement test “as a refinement of Lemon’s second prong”); see also Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471, 479 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 , 123 S.Ct. 1909 , 155 L.Ed.2d 826 (2003) (treating “the endorsement test as a refinement of the second Lemon prong”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Prisma Zona Exploratoria De Puerto Rico, Inc.
v.
Calderon
v.
Calderon
02-1236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 2003.
Published
PRISMA ZONA EXPLORATORIA DE PUERTO RICO, INC.
v.
CALDERON ET AL.
No. 02-1236.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 28, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 310 F. 3d 1.