Andrus v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 1738 (2008). · Go Syfert
Andrus v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 1738 (2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Williams (ca2, 2009-03-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Williams
2d Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
We noted that the Supreme Court had recently “condemn[ed] the insertion of words into a statute as ‘not faithful to the statutory text,’” in United States v. Rodriquez, in which it “rejected the defendant’s argument that ‘reads [section 924(e)] as referring to ‘the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by law’ for a defendant with no prior convictions that trigger a recidivist enhancement,’ because ‘that is not what [section 924(e)] says.’” 529 F.3d at 157 n.5 (quoting United States v. Rodriquez, 128 S. Ct. 1738, 1788-89 (2008) (emphasis in original)). 8 We are not …
cited Cited "see" Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections
E.D. Va. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rayburn House Office Bldg., Room 2113, Washington, D.C. 20515, 497 F.3d 654, 660 (D.C.Cir.2007) cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1295 , 128 S.Ct. 1738 , 170 L.Ed.2d 539 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Cabral v. United States Department of Justice
1st Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puerto Rico v. United States, 490 F.3d 50 , 61 (1st Cir.2007) (citing Touhy, 340 U.S. at 468 , 71 S.Ct. 416 ), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 1738 , 170 L.Ed.2d 538 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" IMS Health Inc. v. Ayotte (2×)
1st Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Nascimento, 491 F.3d 25, 41 (1st Cir.2007) (distinguishing facial and as-applied Commerce Clause challenges to federal law), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1738 , 170 L.Ed.2d 543 (2008). "[I]n evaluating a facial challenge to a state law, a federal court must ... consider any limiting construction that a state court or enforcement agency has proffered." McGuire v. Reilly, 386 F.3d 45, 58 (1st Cir.2004) (quoting Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 795-96 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vinculum, Inc., Aplt. v. Goli Technologies, LLC
Pa. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re Lokuta, 11 A.3d 427, 445-46 (Pa.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 878 (2011); see also Commonwealth v. Crawley, 924 A.2d 612, 616 (Pa. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1297 (2008). [J-31-2023] - 34 damages award.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McKinney v. United States
D. Minnesota · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. United States, 490 F.3d 50 , 64 (1st Cir. 2007), cert denied 128 S.Ct. 1738 (2008); In re U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 459 F.3d 565, 570-71 (5th Cir. 2006); Tuite v. Henry, 181 F.R.D. 175, 176-185 (D.D.C. 1998), aff'd, 203 F.3d 53 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RAY ANDRUS
v.
UNITED STATES
07-7853.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 2008.
128 S. Ct. 1738
Cited by 25 opinions  |  Published

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.