Bieganowski v. United States, 538 U.S. 1014 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Bieganowski v. United States, 538 U.S. 1014 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Garcia-Flores (ca5, 2005-06-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Garcia-Flores
5th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 293-94 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1014 , 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Moffite
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 283 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1014 , 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Moncrief
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 276-77 (5th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 538 U.S. 1014 , 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Matthews
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 283 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1014 , 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Rusty Leisure
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 293 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. *916 1014, 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Diaz
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bieganowski, 313 F.3d 264, 293 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1014 , 123 S.Ct. 1956 , 155 L.Ed.2d 851 (2003); Calverley, 37 F.3d at 162-64 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." TXI Transportation Co. v. Hughes (2×)
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., U.S. v. Lance, 853 F.2d 1177, 1180-81 (5th Cir.1988) (upholding peremptory strike where prosecutor explained that he challenged the venire member because he was “young, single, and without children or ‘a substantial stake in the community 1 ”); Newsome v. State, 829 S.W.2d 260, 266 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992, no pet.) (upholding peremptory strikes exercised on venire members because they were either a teacher, a recent Dallas resident with few ties to the community, or a former East Coast resident); Hernandez v. State, 808 S.W.2d 536, 544 (Tex.App.Waco 1991, no pet.) (holding that …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bieganowski
v.
United States
02-1453.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 2003.
538 U.S. 1014
Published

538 U.S. 1014

BIEGANOWSKI
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-1453.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 5, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 313 F. 3d 264.