Stiles v. Donaldson, 2 Dall. 264 (1796). · Go Syfert
Search
Stiles v. Donaldson, 2 Dall. 264 (1796). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stiles, Plf. in Er. Versus Donaldson
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 1, 1796.
2 Dall. 264
Ingersoll, for the Defendant In Error,, Condy, for the Plaintiff in Error, submitted,
aagent and factor for the defendant.” To the admission of thievidence

But the Court were, unanimously, of opinion, that the accounts, on which the set-off had been claimed, were not within the act of Limitations; and that the Common Pleas had donright in admitting the evidence offered by the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.