green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“dictionaries are always available to the court to aid in the task of determining meanings that would have been attributed by those of skill in the relevant art to any disputed terms used by the inventor in the claims.”
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
dictionaries are always available to the court to aid in the task of determining meanings that would have been attributed by those of skill in the relevant art to any disputed terms used by the inventor in the claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Freeman v. Gerber Products Co.
See Texas Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1212 (Fed.Cir.2002) (reliance on expert testimony would be improper where patent documents are unambiguous), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003); Vitronics Corp., 90 F.3d at 1584 (expert testimony is entitled to no weight where patent documents are unambiguous).
cited
Cited "see"
Display Technologies, LLC v. Mechtronics Corp.
See Texas Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1203 (Fed.Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Info-Hold, Inc. v. Applied Media Technologies Corp.
See, e.g., Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1204 (Fed.Cir.2002) (explaining the presumption favoring ordinary meaning will be overcome by the inventor’s use of words that represent “a clear disavowal of claim scope”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Voda v. Cordis Corp.
See also Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1202 (Fed.Cir.2002) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.
See, e.g., Texas Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1217-18 (Fed.Cir.2002) (holding that, “[i]n the absence of further contemporaneous corroborating evidence, we are unable to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to admit Brown’s testimony for lack of corroboration”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C.R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1204 (Fed.Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 , 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.
LEXIS 6341, at *1 (internal citations omitted); see also Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc. (Fed.Cir.2002) 308 F.3d 1193, 1204 , cert. denied (2003) - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2230 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1108 (courts must first make an effort "to discern the ordinary and customary meanings attributed to the words [of a claim] themselves”). *420 Nonetheless, ”[t]he record before the Patent and Trademark Office is often of critical significance in determining the meaning of the claims.” Vitronics Corp., 90 F.3d at 1582 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wheeler
v.
Jones, Warden
v.
Jones, Warden
02-9901.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 2003.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. West Virginia (1)
WHEELER
v.
JONES, WARDEN.
No. 02-9901.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 27, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Fed. Appx. 23.