green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Knox v. CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES ASS'N
See Cummings v. Connell, 316 F.3d 886, 895 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003) (holding that the Hudson notice was designed to provide nonmembers with information necessary to evaluate whether to object to a union's calculation of chargeable expenses); Hohe v. Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 410 (3d Cir.1992) ("the issue is whether *1134 the notice provided nonmembers with. . . sufficient information to determine whether they were only being compelled to contribute to chargeable activities").
discussed
Cited "see"
Dianne Knox v. California State Employees Association
See Cummings v. Connell, 316 F.3d 886, 895 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003) (holding that the Hudson notice was designed to provide nonmembers with information necessary to evaluate whether to object to a union’s calculation of chargeable expenses); Hohe v. Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 410 (3d Cir.1992) (“the issue is wheth er the notice provided nonmembers with ... sufficient information to determine whether they were only being compelled to contribute to chargeable activities”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Padberg v. Giuliani
Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S. 827, 835-36 , 110 S.Ct. 1570 , 108 L.Ed.2d 842 (1990) (“[T]he purpose of postjudgment interest is to compensate the successful plaintiff for being deprived of compensation for the loss from the time between the ascertainment of the damage and the payment by the defendant.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); accord Goodrich Corp. v. Town of Middlebury, 311 F.3d 154, 178 (2d Cir. 2002), cert denied, 539 U.S. 937 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 621 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.
See Goodrich Corp. v. Town of Middlebury, 311 F.3d 154, 170 (2d Cir.2002) (allocation of response costs is “an equitable determination based on the district court’s discretionary selection of the appropriate equitable factors in a given case.”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 937 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 621 (2003); Bedford Affiliates v. Sills, 156 F.3d 416, 429 (2d Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Priola v. Ashcroft
See Ramtulla v. Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 202, 203-04 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cummings, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Connell
v.
Connell
02-1493.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
Published
Cummings, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Connell et al.
No. 02-1493.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 16, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 316 F. 3d 886.