green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gutierrez v. Dretke
See United States v. Bernard, 299 F.3d 467 (5th Cir.2002) (holding a federal district court was not required to sua sponte sever the punishment phase trials of multiple capital murder defendants where the court instructed the jury to consider each defendant’s punishment separately and there was an insufficient showing the defendants’ punishment phase evidence was either mutually antagonistic or irreconcilable), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 928 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 607 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roman
See United States v. Bernard, 299 F.3d 467, 483-84 (5th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 539 U.S. 928 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 607 (2003) (finding evidence insufficient to support application of “pecuniary gain” aggravator where defendants committed murder not for pecuniary gain but to prevent victims from reporting robbery to police).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Green
See, e.g., United States v. Bernard, 299 F.3d 467, 475 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied 539 U.S. 928 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 607 (2003); see also Perez, 299 F.Supp.2d 38 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Belton
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
02-10037.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
Published
Belton
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.
No. 02-10037.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 16, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied.