Ernesto Cruz v. United States, 539 U.S. 934 (2003). · Go Syfert
Ernesto Cruz v. United States, 539 U.S. 934 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McIntyre v. State (mdctspecapp, 2006-04-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" McIntyre v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both constitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 934 , 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003) (No. 02-10597); United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 1923 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Richardson, 304 F.3d 1061, 1063-64 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 , 123 S.Ct. 930 , 154 L.Ed.2d 832 (2003); United States v. Hersh, 297 F.3d 1233 , 1254 n. 31 (11th Cir.200…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Snitz
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Kimler
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both constitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003) (No. 02-10597); United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1923 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Richardson, 304 *1142 F.3d 1061, 1063-64 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 , 123 S.Ct. 930 , 154 L.Ed.2d 832 (2003); United States v. Hersh, 297 F.3d 1233 , 1254 n. 31 (11th Cir.2002…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeJesus (2×)
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Any insufficiency in proof was caused by the subsequent change in the law under Free Speech Coalition , not the government’s failure to muster evidence.” Id., 533; see also United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir.) (“[b]ecause the government cannot be held responsible for failing to muster evidence sufficient to satisfy a standard [actual minors] which did not exist at the time of trial, and because this is trial error rather than pure insufficiency of evidence, [the defendant] may be retried without violating double jeopardy” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. de…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Destio
3rd Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1141 (10th Cir. 2003) (citing United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both con *892 stitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”)), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 934 , 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003); United States v. Deaton, 328 F.3d 454 (8th Cir.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ernesto Cruz
v.
United States
02-10592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
539 U.S. 934
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

539 U.S. 934

Ernesto Cruz
v.
United States.

No. 02-10592.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 16, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 121.