green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McIntyre v. State
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both constitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 934 , 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003) (No. 02-10597); United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 1923 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Richardson, 304 F.3d 1061, 1063-64 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 , 123 S.Ct. 930 , 154 L.Ed.2d 832 (2003); United States v. Hersh, 297 F.3d 1233 , 1254 n. 31 (11th Cir.200…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Snitz
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimler
See United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both constitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003) (No. 02-10597); United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1923 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Richardson, 304 *1142 F.3d 1061, 1063-64 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1138 , 123 S.Ct. 930 , 154 L.Ed.2d 832 (2003); United States v. Hersh, 297 F.3d 1233 , 1254 n. 31 (11th Cir.2002…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. DeJesus
(2×)
Any insufficiency in proof was caused by the subsequent change in the law under Free Speech Coalition , not the government’s failure to muster evidence.” Id., 533; see also United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir.) (“[b]ecause the government cannot be held responsible for failing to muster evidence sufficient to satisfy a standard [actual minors] which did not exist at the time of trial, and because this is trial error rather than pure insufficiency of evidence, [the defendant] may be retried without violating double jeopardy” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Destio
See, e.g., United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1141 (10th Cir. 2003) (citing United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1213 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 2256 contained both con *892 stitutional and unconstitutional definitions of “child pornography”)), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 934 , 123 S.Ct. 2591 , 156 L.Ed.2d 616 (2003); United States v. Deaton, 328 F.3d 454 (8th Cir.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ernesto Cruz
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-10592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Ernesto Cruz
v.
United States.
No. 02-10592.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 16, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 121.