green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Windley
See State v. Carroll, 356 N.C. 526, 574 , 573 S.E.2d 899, 913 (2002) (stating that fingerprint cards are “clearly admissible” under the business records exception to the hearsay rule), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 949 , 156 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gattis
See State v. Carroll, 356 N.C. 526, 543 , 573 S.E.2d 899, 910 (2002) (victim’s hearsay statements that she wanted defendant to move out because she was tired of him taking her money to buy drugs were admissible under Rule 803(3) because the statements “indicate difficulties in the relationship prior to the murder”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 949 , 156 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roache
See State v. Carroll, 356 N.C. 526, 538-40 , 573 S.E.2d 899, 907-09 (2002) (finding no plain error where the trial court gave pattern jury instructions on diminished capacity), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 156 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arreola Ramos
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-10645.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 2003.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
Arreola Ramos
v.
United States.
No. 02-10645.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 23, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 122.