Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 539 U.S. 974 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 539 U.S. 974 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (HC) Delgado v. McDowell (caed, 2023-06-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) (HC) Delgado v. McDowell
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · confidence medium
The Miranda warning was withheld to obscure both the practical and legal significance of the 13 admonition when finally given.” (Id. at p. 620 [ 124 S.Ct. 2601 ].) 14 “When an interrogator uses this deliberate, two-step 15 strategy, predicated upon violating Miranda during an extended interview, postwarning statements that are related 16 to the substance of prewarning statements must be excluded absent specific, curative steps.” (Id. at p. 621 [ 124 S.Ct. 17 2601], italics added.) 18 “I would apply a narrower test applicable only in the infrequent case, such as we have here, in which t…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tandon v. GN Audio USA, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 , 124 S. Ct. 17 513, 157 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Republican National Committee
v.
Federal Election Commission
02-1727.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 4, 2003.
539 U.S. 974
Published

539 U.S. 974

Republican National Committee et al.
v.
Federal Election Commission et al.

No. 02-1727.

Supreme Court of United States.

August 4, 2003.

1

Appeal from the D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 911.]

2

Motion for divided argument of plaintiffs in Nos. 02-1674, 02-1727, 02-1733, 02-1734, 02-1753, 02-1755, and 02-1756 granted, except that 60 minutes are allotted for argument on Title I and § 213 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and 50 minutes are allotted on the remainder of the challenged provisions. Motion of Emily Echols et al. and Barret Austin O'Brock for divided argument granted limited to 10 minutes for plaintiffs. Motions for divided argument of plaintiffs in Nos. 02-1675, 02-1740, and 02-1747 denied. Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.