green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Flanagan
See Daniels v. Lee, 316 F.3d 477, 490 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 851 , 124 S. Ct. 137 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flanagan
(2×)
See Daniels v. Lee, 316 F.3d 477, 490 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 851 , 124 S. Ct. 137 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See Grandison v. State, 305 Md. 685, 765 , 506 A.2d 580 (“By dropping the subject and never again raising it, [appellant] waived his right to appellate review”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 873 , 107 S.Ct. 38 , 93 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986); see also Whittington v. State, 147 Md.App. 496, 537 , 809 A.2d 721 (2002) (holding that, where defense counsel did not dispute trial court’s ruling limitation on expert testimony, the issue was not preserved), cert. denied, 373 Md. 408 , 818 A.2d 1107 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 851 , 124 S.Ct. 136 , 157 L.Ed.2d 92 (2003). *563 Moreover, we are not persuaded that th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whittington
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
02-11044.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
WHITTINGTON
v.
MARYLAND.
No. 02-11044.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the Ct. Sp. App. Md.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 147 Md. App. 496, 809 A. 2d 721.