green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, Warden
See Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557, 566 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied,, 540 U.S. 853 , 124 S.Ct. 140 , 157 L.Ed.2d 95 (2003) (“[T]he government does not argue that such comments were appropriate, but they were limited, isolated and mitigated when the court gave the jury appropriate *783 instructions, which would have cured any misperception that the jury might have received from the prosecutor’s arguments.
examined
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. BILLIE JEROME ALLEN, —
(3×)
See United States v. Ayala, 313 F.3d 1068, 1070 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 140 , 157 L.Ed.2d 95 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brinkley v. Houk
Id. (citing Payne, 501 U.S. at 825 , 111 S.Ct. 2597 ); See also Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557, 565-66 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 853 , 124 S.Ct. 140 , 157 L.Ed.2d 95 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sanders
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-11071.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
SANDERS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-11071.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Fed. Appx. 765.