Matter of Comput. Tech. Corp., 346 S.E.2d 137 (N.C. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Comput. Tech. Corp., 346 S.E.2d 137 (N.C. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cherney v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK (ncctapp, 2007-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cherney v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
Dept. of Transportation, 86 N.C.App. 299 , 357 S.E.2d 439 (1987); Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc., 79 N.C.App. 678, 684 , 340 S.E.2d 755, 759-60 , cert. denied, 317 N.C. 333 , 346 S.E.2d 137 *247 (1986) (finding that the failure of appellant to "except and assign error separately to each finding or conclusion that he or she contends is not supported by the evidence . . . will result in waiver of the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support particular findings of fact").
discussed Cited "see" Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SU (2×)
N.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crump v. Board of Education, 79 N.C.App. 372 , 339 S.E.2d 483 , disc. rev. denied, 317 N.C. 333 , 346 S.E.2d 137 .
discussed Cited "see" Crump v. Board of Education (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at Sec. 27.
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. Bollinger
N.C. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc., 79 N.C.App. 678, 681 , 340 S.E.2d 755, 758 , cert. denied, 317 N.C. 333 , 346 S.E.2d 137 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION.
101P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 2, 1986.
346 S.E.2d 137
Published

Casstevens, Hanner, Gunter & Gordon, Charlotte, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Computer Technology in this matter pursuant to G.S. § 7A-30, and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Computer Technology pursuant to G.S. § 731, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of July 1986."

The Petition for Discretionary Review is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of July 1986."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Computer Technology for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of July 1986."

Therefore, it is considered and adjudged further that Computer Technology do pay the sum of Nine and no/100 Dollars ($9.00) and that execution issue therefor.