Walker v. Lamarque, Warden, 540 U.S. 857 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Walker v. Lamarque, Warden, 540 U.S. 857 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 · …he supreme court has recognized that there is a presumption that, when congress creates two distinct offenses, it intends to permit cumulative sentences. ⚠ not in text
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Keene (me, 2007-07-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Keene (4×) also: Cited "see"
Me. · 2007 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
he supreme court has recognized that there is a presumption that, when congress creates two distinct offenses, it intends to permit cumulative sentences.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Lamarque, Warden
02-11151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 857
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (2)

540 U.S. 857

WALKER
v.
LAMARQUE, WARDEN.

No. 02-11151.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.