discussed Cited "see" Swanson v. Medical Action Industries, Inc. Devine v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Elkhart County, 49 Fed.Appx. 57, 61-62 (7th Cir.2002) (citing Lee, supra, at 677 ); accord, Gilmore v. AT & T, 319 F.3d 1042 , 1047 *501 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 955 , 124 S.Ct. 405 , 157 L.Ed.2d 291 (2003) (“In her Social Security benefits application and in her deposition testimony, Gilmore conceded that she could not perform the essential functions of her job[.] ...

cited Cited "see" Selena Marquez v. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. See Gilmore v. AT & T, 319 F.3d 1042, 1046 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 405 , 157 L.Ed.2d 291 (2003).

cited Cited "see" Selena Marquez v. Bridgestone See Gilmore v. AT&T, 319 F.3d 1042, 1046 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 405 (2003).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hoag v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department Corp., 526 U.S. 795, 806 , 119 S.Ct. 1597 , 143 L.Ed.2d 966 *522 (1999) (plaintiff cannot simply ignore apparent contradiction between sworn assertion in Social Security disability application of inability to work and claim that she is qualified to perform essential functions of job); see also Gilmore v. AT & T, 319 F.3d 1042, 1047 (8th Cir.) (because plaintiff failed to reconcile statement of inability to work on application for disability benefits with disability-discrimination claim, district court properly concluded that plaintiff was not qualified individual), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 955 ,…