green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ROETTGEN v. Ryan
“The state court’s application must have been ‘objectively unreasonable.’ ” Id. at 520-21 , 123 S.Ct. 2527 (citation omitted); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1068 (9th Cir.) (under “unreasonable application” clause, federal habeas court may not issue writ simply because it concludes in its independent judgment that relevant state court decision applied clearly established law erroneously or incorrectly; rather, application must be objectively unreasonable), cer t. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 5.Ct. 446, 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grady v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1073 (9th Cir.2003) (defendant’s confession voluntary though he had been held and intermittently questioned in small room for eight hours), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003); Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 396-402 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978) (where suspect interrogated for four hours in intensive care unit, had tubes in his throat and nose, was heavily medicated, had been shot, and had not been afforded counsel despite explicit request for counsel, statements deemed involuntary); Jenner v. Smith, 982 F.2d 329…
discussed
Cited "see"
Studebaker v. Uribe
Ninth Circuit case law “may be persuasive authority for purposes of determining whether a particular state court decision is an ‘unreasonable application’ of Supreme Court law, and also may help ... determine what law is ‘clearly established.’ ” Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1999, as amended Jan. 10, 2000); accord Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 , 123 S.Ct. 1166 . *1111 Section “2254(d) (l)’s ‘contrary to’ and ‘…
discussed
Cited "see"
Guevara v. State
See Kavali v. State, No. 05-01-00835-CR, 2002 WL 31445280 , *4 (Tex.App.-Dallas Nov.4, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication) (instruction included when a party is criminally responsible and quoted Family Code provision stating parent’s duty of “care, control and protection” of a child), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 , 124 S.Ct. 445 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Myers v. Mendoza-Powers
“The state court’s application must have been ‘objectively unreasonable.’” Id. (citation omitted); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dotson v. Scribner
“The state court’s application must have been ‘objectively unreason *873 able.’ ” Id. (citation omitted); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boultinghouse v. Hall
“The state court’s application must have been ‘objectively unreasonable.’ ” Id. at 520-21 , 123 S.Ct. 2527 (citation omitted); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ricky Lee Earp v. John Stokes, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin
Casey v. Moore, 386 F.3d 896, 907 (9th Cir.2004); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir.2003), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003); Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 602-03 (9th Cir.2000) (Ninth Circuit precedent derived from an extension of a Supreme Court decision is not “clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Earp v. Ornoski
Casey v. Moore, 386 F.3d 896, 907 (9th Cir.2004); see also Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003); Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 602-03 (9th Cir. 2000) (Ninth Circuit precedent derived from an extension of a Supreme Court decision is not “clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lct Transportation Services, Inc., AKA Lester Coggins Trucking, Inc.
v.
Barragan
v.
Barragan
03-293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 2003.
Published
LCT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., AKA LESTER COGGINS TRUCKING, INC.
v.
BARRAGAN ET AL.
No. 03-293.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 20, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 65 Fed. Appx. 715.