Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN, 241 S.E.2d 844 (N.C. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN, 241 S.E.2d 844 (N.C. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEEMAN PRINTERY, INC.
v.
Philip C. SCHINLAN, Individually and d/b/a Von Press.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 7, 1978.
241 S.E.2d 844
Published

Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger & Jonas, for defendant.

Mount, White, King, Hutson, Walker & Carden, for plaintiff.

Defendant's notice of appeal under GS 7A-30, 34 N.C.App. 637, 239 S.E.2d 744, dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.