green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
(3×)
See Henry v. Louisiana, 392 U.S. 655 , 88 S.Ct. 2274 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1343 .) The data desired herein by the defendant could have been obtained by a motion for a bill of particulars, as was done in State v. Prejean, supra. Of course, it is true that the defendant did not ask for a bill of particulars; but the record reflects, neverthe less, that such information was obtained by him at the preliminary hearing, during which the prosecuting witness testified some two months prior to the date of the trial.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
932.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1968.
Thomas Barr III for appellant., Jack P. F. Oremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Harlan.
Cited by 36 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.