Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 559 S.E.2d 547 (N.C. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 559 S.E.2d 547 (N.C. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Harding v. Board of Adjust. of Davie Cty. (ncctapp, 2005-05-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Harding v. Board of Adjust. of Davie Cty.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: but see · confidence high
App. 603, 609 , 592 S.E.2d 205, 209 (2004) (internal citations and question marks omitted); but see, Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Bd. of Adjustment, 355 N.C. 269 , 559 S.E.2d 547 (2002) (Superior court’s failure to set forth standard of review does not necessitate reversal).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CAPITAL OUTDOOR, INC., Petitioner
v.
GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondent
603A01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 7, 2002.
559 S.E.2d 547
Waller, Stroud, Stewart & Araneda, LLP, by Betty S. Waller, for petitioner-appellee. , Guilford County Attorney’s Office, by Jonathan V. Maxwell, County Attorney, and Mercedes O. Chut, Deputy County Attorney, for respondent-appellant.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 29 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the standard of review and remand the case to that court for consideration of the other assignments of error on the merits.

REVERSED.