Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
John Calvin Taylor, II v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2003), cert. denied, Taylor v. Florida, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aros
See Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 248-49 (4th Cir.2003) (en banc) cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); Modrowski v. Mote, 322 F.3d 965, 967-68 (7th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Martin, 408 F.3d 1089, 1093 (8th Cir.2005) (“[S]erious attorney misconduct, as opposed to mere negligence, may warrant equitable tolling.”) (quotation marks omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Salyers v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Dewberry v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); Enich v. State, 838 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Taplis, 684 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), review dismissed, 703 So.2d 453 (Fla.1997), both standing for the proposition that a party attempting to exclude otherwise relevant evidence on the basis of a gap in the chain of custody must show a likelihood or probability of tampering.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1, 30 (Fla.2003) ("Although Taylor introduced testimony of family and friends that he was a nonviolent person, the trial judge was free to weigh the testimony of the individuals [against Taylor's previous armed robbery conviction] and still reject the mitigating circumstance."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arcoren
Martin, 408 F.3d at 1093 ; see also Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 248-49 (4th Cir.2003) (noting that basic attorney errors are usually insufficient to support equitable tolling), ce rt. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Timothy Lanier Allen v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
(2×)
See ante at 348-349; see also Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 254 (4th Cir.2003) (en banc) ("[A]ny distinctions between the procedures required in capital and noncapital cases are primarily relevant to trial...." (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); cf. Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249, 256-58 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988) (holding that the same Chapman harmless error standard applies on direct review of both capital and noncapital cases).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TAYLOR
v.
FLORIDA.
v.
FLORIDA.
03-7883.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 2004.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 855 So. 2d 1.