green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Van Poyck v. State
See Van Poyck v. Crosby, 860 So.2d 980 (Fla.2008) (table), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 974 , 124 S.Ct. 1884 , 158 L.Ed.2d 469 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Molder
(2×)
See Amrendariz v. State, 123 S.W.3d 401 , 403 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (We must “uphold the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress if that ruling was supported by the record and was correct under any theory of law applicable to the case.”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 974 , 124 S.Ct. 1883 , 158 L.Ed.2d 469 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Hurley
See Jurado v. Burt, 337 F.3d 638, 644-45 (6th Cir.2003) (“Generally, ‘a lawyer’s mistake is not a valid basis for equitable tolling.’ ” (quoting Whalen v. Randle, 37 Fed.Appx. 113, 120 (6th Cir.2002))); see also Colwell v. Tanner, 79 Fed.Appx. 89, 92-93 (6th Cir.2003) (holding that an attorney’s “unwise” choice to file a habeas petition late was “not grounds for tolling the statutorily mandated one-year limitations period”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 974 , 124 S.Ct. 1884 , 158 L.Ed.2d 469 (2004); Elliott v. Dewitt, 10 Fed.Appx. 311, 313 (6th Cir.2001) (“[A]n attorney’s mis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Twin Lakes Development Corp.
v.
Town of Monroe, New York
v.
Town of Monroe, New York
03-1121.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 2004.
Published
TWIN LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORP.
v.
TOWN OF MONROE, NEW YORK.
No. 03-1121.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 5, 2004.
1
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 N. Y. 3d 98, 801 N. E. 2d 821.