green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
“conviction of a criminal charge is not a constitutional prerequisite to the revocation of parole.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Siggers v. Hamp
conviction of a criminal charge is not a constitutional prerequisite to the revocation of parole.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sagaral v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LP
In discriminatory discharge cases based on an employee’s alleged violation of a “work rule,” plaintiffs “may establish a prima facie case by showing ‘either that [they] did not violate the rule or that, if [they] did, [employees outside the protected class] who engaged in similar acts were not punished similarly.’ ” Mayberry v. Vought Aircraft Co., 55 F.3d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.1995) (quoting Green v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 612 F.2d 967, 968 (5th Cir.1980)); see also Simmons v. Rothe Dev., Inc., 952 F.Supp. 486, 490 (S.D.Tex.1997), aff'd, 132 F.3d 1456 (5th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. Methodist Hospital System
See Mayberry v. Vought Aircraft Co., 55 F.3d 1086, 1090-92 (5th Cir.1995); see also Simmons v. Rothe Dev., Inc., 952 F.Supp. 486, 490 (S.D.Tex.), aff’d, 132 F.3d 1456 (5th Cir.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeLoach
v.
General Dynamics
v.
General Dynamics
132 F.3d 1456
DeLoach
v.
General Dynamics[*]
NO. 96-11190
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec 04, 1997
Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.4:93CV73Y
1
Affirmed.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2