green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Ochoa
(3×)
See United States v. Reyna, 358 F.3d 344, 353 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1065 , 124 S.Ct. 2390 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Serrano-Beauvaix
(2×)
See United States v. Reyna, 358 F.3d 344, 352-53 (5th Cir.2004) ( en banc ), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2390 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sumpter
(2×)
See United States v. Hylton, 349 F.3d 781, 789 (4th Cir.2003) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2391 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co.
(2×)
See Swedenburg v. Kelly, 358 F.3d 223 (2d Cir.2004), cert. granted, 541 U.S. 1062 , 124 S.Ct. 2391 , 158 L.Ed.2d 962 (U.S. May 24, 2004) (No. 03-1274); Heald v. Engler, 342 F.3d 517 (6th Cir.2003), cert. granted, 541 U.S. 1062 , 124 S.Ct. 2389 , 158 L.Ed.2d 962 (U.S. 2004) (No. 03-1116); Heald v. Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Ass'n, 342 F.3d 517 (6th Cir.2003), cert. granted, 541 U.S. 1062 , 124 S.Ct. 2389 , 158 L.Ed.2d 962 (U.S. 2004) (No. 03-1120).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kerbeck Cadillac Pontiac, Inc. v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers & Salespersons
See Swedenburg v. Kelly, 358 F.3d 223 (Cir.2d2004), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2391 , 158 L.Ed.2d 962 (2004) (statute prohibiting advertising of alcoholic beverages in New York by unlicensed persons violates free speech guarantees of the First Amendment.) Judge FRIEDMAN joins in this dissent.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz-Rosas
See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000), abrogated on other grounds, United States v. Reyna, 358 F.3d 344, 350 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2390 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robertson
See, e.g., United States v. Reyna, 358 F.3d 344 , 347-51 & n. 6 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1065 , 124 S.Ct. 2390 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Reyna, 358 F.3d 344, 351-52 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (presuming prejudice from a denial of allo-cution “given the nature of the right and the difficulty of proving that a violation affected a specific sentence”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1065 , 124 S.Ct. 2390 , 158 L.Ed.2d 966 (2004); United States v. Prouty, 303 F.3d 1249, 1253 (11th Cir.2002) (presuming prejudice from a denial of allocution “[b]e-cause allocution plays a central role in the sentencing process” and “a defendant cannot easily demonstrate prejudice” caused by its denial); United States v. Adams…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lopez-Ortiz
v.
United States
v.
United States
03-9098.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 2004.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
LOPEZ-ORTIZ
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 03-9098.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 24, 2004.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 Fed. Appx. 773.