Gutierrez v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 541 U.S. 1076 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Gutierrez v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 541 U.S. 1076 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the eustody inquiry states an objective rule designed to give clear guidance to the police, while consideration of a suspect's individual characteristics-including his age-could be viewed as creating a subjective inquiry.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Cowart (colo, 2010-12-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) People v. Cowart
Colo. · 2010 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the eustody inquiry states an objective rule designed to give clear guidance to the police, while consideration of a suspect's individual characteristics-including his age-could be viewed as creating a subjective inquiry.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gutierrez
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-9588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
541 U.S. 1076
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Colorado (1)

541 U.S. 1076

GUTIERREZ
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.

No. 03-9588.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 1, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.