green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cuevas
See State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 161-62 , 82 P3d 593 (2003) (describing sentencing guideline rules), vac’d and rem’d on other grounds, Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cuevas
(2×)
See State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 161-62 , 82 P3d 593 (2003) (describing sentencing guideline rules), vac’d and rent’d on other grounds, Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. LOPEZ-DANIEL
See Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Warren
See State v. Dilts, 179 Or App 238, 244 , 39 P3d 276 (2002), aff'd, 336 Or 158, 180 , 82 P3d 595 (2003), vac’d and rent’d on other grounds, 542 US _ , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davilla
See State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009) (explaining statutory construction methodology); see also State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 162 , 82 P3d 593 (2003), vac’d and rent’d sub nom Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (sentencing guidelines “have the authority of statutory law”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lafferty
See also Dilts v. Oregon, 542 U.S. 934 , 124 S.Ct. 2906 , 159 L.Ed.2d 809 (2004) (applying Blakely to the Oregon sentencing guidelines).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lafferty
See also Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (applying Blakely to the Oregon sentencing guidelines).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ice
(2×)
Compare State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158 , 82 P3d 593 (2003), vac’d and rem’d, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (holding that Apprendi did not apply to departure sentences), with State v. Dilts, 337 Or 645 , 103 P3d 95 (2004) (holding, on remand in light of Blakely, that Apprendi applies to departure sentences).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartsfield
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03M82.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Published
Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time under this Court’s Rule 14.5 denied.