green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Levanduski
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Santiago, 822 A.2d 716, 729 (Pa.Super.2003), appeal denied, 577 Pa. 679 , 843 A.2d 1237 (2004), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 942 , 124 S.Ct. 2916 , 159 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004) (stating "forfeiture by wrongdoing" exception to hearsay rule applies when accused's criminal wrongdoing was committed with intent to make witness unavailable to testify; the exception does not apply when defendant murdered victim not to prevent him from testifying but because of personal animosity) (citing Commonwealth v. Laich, 566 Pa. 19 , 28 n. 4, 777 A.2d 1057 , 1062 n. 4 (2001)). ¶ 30 Regarding the "state…
cited
Cited "see"
Hunt v. State
See Wilcher v. State, 863 So.2d 776 (Miss.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 942 , 124 S.Ct. 2917 , 159 L.Ed.2d 821 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phelps Et Ux.
v.
Nationwide Insurance Co
v.
Nationwide Insurance Co
03-10168.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Published
PHELPS ET UX.
v.
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE CO.
No. 03-10168.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 28, 2004.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 84 Fed. Appx. 591.