green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keiron M. Elias v. D. Mimaki
See, e.g., Serrano v. Francis, 345 26 F.3d 1071, 1078 (9th Cir. 2003) (placement in segregated housing in and of itself typically not due process violation) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 825 (2004); Anderson v. Kern, 27 || 45 F.3d 1310, 1315 (9th Cir.) (“[T]he hardship associated with administrative segregation, such 28 as a loss of recreational and rehabilitative programs or confinement to one's cell for a lengthy (continued...) 19 1 || U.S. at 832 (citations omitted); Foster v. Runnels, 554 F.3d 807, 812 (9th Cir. 2 || 2009) (citing Farmer, 511 U.S. at 832 ); see also Stinson…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. T. Redmon
The Sandin Court identified three key factors for courts to consider: 16 (1) whether the challenged condition “mirrored those conditions imposed upon inmates in 17 administrative segregation and protective custody[,]” and thus comported with the prison’s 18 discretionary authority; (2) the duration of the condition and the degree of restraint imposed; and 19 (3) whether the state’s action will inevitably affect the duration of the prisoner’s sentence. 20 Sandin, 515 U.S. at 486–87; see also Serrano v. Francis, 345 F.3d 1071, 1078 (9th Cir. 2003), 21 cert denied, 543 U.S. 825 (2004)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atamian
v.
Hawk
v.
Hawk
03-10106.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
Published
ATAMIAN
v.
HAWK ET AL.
No. 03-10106.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 842 A. 2d 1244.