green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Prack
Accordingly, we do not find that the Hearing Officer abused his discretion in excluding petitioner from the hearing (see Matter of Alexander v Ricks, 8 AD3d 942, 944 [2004]; compare Matter of Berrian v Selsky, 306 AD2d 771, 772 [2003], appeal dismissed 100 NY2d 631 [2003], cert denied 543 US 841 [2004]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Prack
Accordingly, we do not find that the Hearing Officer abused his discretion in excluding petitioner from the hearing (see Matter of Alexander v Ricks, 8 AD3d 942, 944 [2004]; compare Matter of Berrian v Selsky, 306 AD2d 771, 772 [2003], appeal dismissed 100 NY2d 631 [2003], cert denied 543 US 841 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Mitchell, Warden
v.
Mitchell, Warden
03-10621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 841
Published
SMITH
v.
MITCHELL, WARDEN.
No. 03-10621.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 348 F. 3d 177.