Ratliff v. Cain, Warden, 543 U.S. 859 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Ratliff v. Cain, Warden, 543 U.S. 859 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 · …here is no constitutional mandate forbidding the use of deception in executing a valid arrest warrant ⚠ not in text
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Sitaras (connappct, 2008-03-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Sitaras (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
here is no constitutional mandate forbidding the use of deception in executing a valid arrest warrant
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ratliff
v.
Cain, Warden
03-10950.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 859
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2)

543 U.S. 859

RATLIFF
v.
CAIN, WARDEN.

No. 03-10950.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.