Fred Settoon, Inc. v. Gros, 543 U.S. 955 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Fred Settoon, Inc. v. Gros, 543 U.S. 955 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pharmaceutical Sales Consulting Corp. v. Accucorp Packaging, Inc. (ca3, 2007-01-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Pharmaceutical Sales Consulting Corp. v. Accucorp Packaging, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 359 F.3d 194, 204-05 (3d Cir.2004) (the statute reaches all breaches of duty, including the duty to refrain from self-dealing), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 955 , 125 S.Ct. 408 , 160 L.Ed.2d 316 (2004); Cameco, Inc. v. Gedicke, 157 N.J. 504 , 724 A.2d 783, 789 (1999) (employee’s self-dealing may breach the duty of loyalty).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Legros
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See People v. Leonardo, 89 A.D.2d 214, 215-16 , 455 N.Y.S.2d 434, 435-36 (4th Dep’t 1982) (finding evidence insufficient to support intent to cause serious physical injury where defendant aims gun at tree), aff'd, 60 N.Y.2d 683 , 455 N.E.2d 1261 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 466 (1983); see also United States v. Pimentel, 346 F.3d 285, 298 (2d Cir.2003) (stating that under New York law of attempts, defendant must engage in conduct that comes “dangerously near” commission of the completed crime, and that “[i]n the context of attempted murder prosecutions ... the Government must establish that the defe…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mullens (2×)
W. Va. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Fifth Circuit reasoned: Once Brathwaite invited the CI into his home, he "forfeited his privacy interest in those activities that were exposed to [the CI]." United States v. Davis, 326 F.3d 361, 366 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 281 , 157 L.Ed.2d 196 (2003); see also United States v. Lee, 359 F.3d 194, 201 (3d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 955 , 125 S.Ct. 408 , 160 L.Ed.2d 316 (2004) ("The principle underlying the governing Supreme Court cases is that if a defendant consents to the presence of a person who could testify about a meeting and is willing to reveal w…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Walters v. Corrections Corp. of America
10th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gonzales v. City of Castle Rock, 366 F.3d 1093, 1112 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc) (cert. granted, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 417 , 160 L.Ed.2d 316 (2004)) (stating “when the deprivation is caused by established state procedures, the existence of an adequate remedy at state law does not extinguish a procedural due process claim”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fred Settoon, Inc.
v.
Gros
03-1699.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 2004.
543 U.S. 955
Published

543 U.S. 955

FRED SETTOON, INC.
v.
GROS.

No. 03-1699.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 1, 2004.

1

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 865 So. 2d 143.