green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Abbott
See Rodriguez v. Pataki, 308 F. Supp. 2d 346, 421 (S.D.N.Y.) (three judge court), aff’d, 543 U.S. 997 (2004) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pope v. County of Albany
Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725, 740 , 103 S.Ct. 2653 , 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983); accord Rodriguez v. Pataki, 308 F.Supp.2d 346, 363 (S.D.N.Y.) (applying Karcher in context of redistricting of state legislature), aff'd, 543 U.S. 997 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 454 (2004); see generally Favors v. Cuomo, No. 11-cv-5632 (RR)(GEL)(DLI)(RLM), 2012 WL 928223 , at *4-7 (E.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. McCrory
See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Pataki, 308 F.Supp.2d 346, 438-39 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (rejecting an “analysis [that] examines racially polarized voting without addressing the specifics of the third Gingles factor, which requires white majority bloc voting that usually defeats the [minority]-preferred candidate” and noting that “[e]ven if there were racially polarized voting, the report does not speak — one way or the other — to the effects of the polarized voting”), aff'd, 543 U.S. 997 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 454 (2004); Moon v. Meadows, 952 F.Supp. 1141, 1149-50 (E.D.Va.1997) (state coul…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pender County v. Bartlett
See, e.g., Hall v. Virginia, 385 F.3d 421 (4th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 602 (2005) and Rodriguez v. Pataki, 308 F.Supp.2d 346 (S.D.N.Y.) (per curiam), aff'd mem., 543 U.S. 997 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 454 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez Et Al.
v.
Pataki, Governor of New York, Et Al.
v.
Pataki, Governor of New York, Et Al.
04-218.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2004.
Stevens.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y.
Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.