Armstrong v. Rushton, 543 U.S. 1004 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Armstrong v. Rushton, 543 U.S. 1004 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases · “Higgs II”
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Higgs (mdd, 2016-06-29) · Strongest negative: Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. (ca6, 2011-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.
6th Cir. · 2011 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Therm-All, Inc., 373 F.3d 625, 635-36 (5th Cir.) (reading this language in Hayter Oil as unpersuasive dicta because other coconspirators admitted that they had committed overt acts within the statute-of-limitations period), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 , 125 S.Ct. 632 , 160 L.Ed.2d 464 (2004).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Higgs
D. Maryland · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
higgs ii
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Higgs v. United States
D. Maryland · 2010 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
higgs ii
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mandingo Simms (2×)
8th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, when timely -6- objection is made, as it was in Bell, see 785 F.2d at 643 n.3, the district court must assess “the explanation the government offers of why confrontation is undesirable or impractical” and “the reliability of the evidence which the government offers in place of live testimony” before deciding whether “the probationer is entitled to confrontation.” Id. at 643 ; see United States v. Martin, 371 F.3d 446, 448-49 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 (2004).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
N.D. Iowa · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 299 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 , 125 S.Ct. 608 , 160 L.Ed.2d 465 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. United States
N.D. Iowa · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 299 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 , 125 S.Ct. 608 , 160 L.Ed.2d 465 (2004).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robertson
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martin, 371 F.3d 446, 449-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 , 125 S.Ct. 608 , 160 L.Ed.2d 465 (2004); United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492-93 (8th Cir.1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Craig Robertson
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martin, 371 F.3d 446, 449-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 (2004); United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492-93 (8th Cir. 1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Shipsey
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shipsey, 363 F.3d 962 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1004 , 125 S.Ct. 634 , 160 L.Ed.2d 465 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armstrong
v.
Rushton, Trustee Armstrong v. Rushton, Trustee Armstrong v. Rushton, Trustee Armstrong v. Ruston, Trustee and Armstrong v. Rushton, Trustee
04-546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2004.
543 U.S. 1004
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: D. Maryland (2)

543 U.S. 1004

ARMSTRONG
v.
RUSHTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.;
ARMSTRONG
v.
RUSHTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.;
ARMSTRONG
v.
RUSHTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.;
ARMSTRONG
v.
RUSTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; and
ARMSTRONG
v.
RUSHTON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

No. 04-546.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 29, 2004.

1

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 97 Fed. Appx. 285 (fourth judgment); 99 Fed. Appx. 860 (first judgment) and 866 (third judgment); 101 Fed. Appx. 766 (second judgment).