green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Benters
See United States v. Perkins, 363 F.3d 317, 320-23 (4th Cir. 2004) (explaining that an informant’s tip was reliable when the informant (1) was known to the investigating officer, (2) had provided reliable information on six to ten prior occasions, and (3) lived directly across the street from the defendant, and when material aspects of the tip were corroborated), ce rt. denied, 543 U.S. 1056 , 125 S. Ct. 867 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Aubin v. Quarterman
See Riley v. Dretke, 362 F.3d 302, 306 (5th Cir.2004) (even in capital case, counsel’s not presenting evidence of mental retardation as mitigating evidence is reasonable in order to prevent negative jury finding on issue of future dangerousness), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1056 , 125 S.Ct. 866 , 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Awadallah
See Awadallah v. United States, 543 U.S. 1056 , 125 S.Ct. 861 , 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gutierrez v. Quarterman
Turner v. Johnson, 106 F.3d 1178 , 1184 n. 16 (5th Cir.1997) (internal citations omitted); see also Riley v. Dretke, 362 F.3d 302 (5th Cir.2004) (holding petitioner cannot show a substantial need for investigative assistance when the claims he seeks to pursue are procedurally barred), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1056 , 125 S.Ct. 866 , 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prieto v. Dretke
See, e.g., Riley v. Cockrell, 339 F.3d 308, 316-17 (5th Cir.2003), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 866 , 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005), (holding trial counsel were not per se deficient in failing to present mitigating evidence); Hopkins v. Cockrell, 325 F.3d 579, 586 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 , 124 S.Ct. 430 , 157 L.Ed.2d 314 (2003), (recognizing that the decision to present double-edged mitigating evidence lies within trial counsel’s broad tactical or strategic discretion); Smith v. Cockrell, 311 F.3d 661, 669 (5th Cir.2002), cert. dism’d, 541 U.S. 913 , 124 S.Ct. 1652 , 15…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred Nobriga
See, e.g., United States v. Grajeda-Ramirez, 348 F.3d 1123, 1125 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 863 , 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005); United States v. Ceron-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1169, 1172-73 (9th Cir.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riley
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
04-5723.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2005.
Published
RILEY
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.
No. 04-5723.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 2005.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 362 F. 3d 302.