Kanatzar v. United States, 543 U.S. 1107 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Kanatzar v. United States, 543 U.S. 1107 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Forbes (ca2, 2016-12-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Forbes
2d Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Forbes v. United States, 543 U.S. 1100 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cauthen
M.D.N.C. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Kanatzar, 370 F.3d 810, 813 (8th Cir.2004) (expressly rejecting Duguay in considering the likelihood of theft or vandalism when determining the reasonableness of an impoundment) (citing cases), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1107 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2005), opinion reinstated by 139 Fed.Appx. 760 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Jensen, 425 F.3d 698, 706 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "[o]nce the arrest was made, the [community caretaker] doctrine allowed law enforcement officers to seize and *636 remove any vehicle which may impede traffi…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Wilson
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kanatzar, 370 F.3d 810, 814 (8th Cir.2004), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 543 U.S. 1107 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1029 (U.S. Jan. 24, 2005) (No. 04-6088).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jacob Kanatzar
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kanatzar v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2005), granting cert, and vacating the judgment in United States v. Kanatzar, 370 F.3d 810 (8th Cir. 2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Missouri, ex rel, Chris Koster, Attorney General v. Mark Bailey
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., U.S. v. Vondette, 352 F.3d 772 , 775 (2d Cir.2003) (ERISA’s anti-alienation provisions “do not purport to apply to IRAs”), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1108 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005); Goldblatt v. F.D.I.C., 105 F,3d 1325, 1329 (9th Cir.1997) (“29 U.S.C. § 1051(6) specifically exempts pension plans that qualify.as IRAs under 26 U.S.C. ■§ 408 from ERISA’s anti-alienation requirement”) (citing Patterson, 504 U.S. at 762-63 , 112 S.Ct. 2242 ); VFS Fin., Inc. v. Elias-Savion-Fox LLC, 73 F.Supp.3d 329, 341 (S.D.N.Y.2014) (anti-alienation provision is…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mangum
8th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 591-92; see also United States v. Kanatzar, 370 F.3d 810, 816 (8th Cir.2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1107 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2005), opinion reinstated, 139 Fed.Appx. 760 (8th Cir.2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Guiheen
8th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Mack, 343 F.3d 929, 936 (8th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Kanatzar, 370 F.3d 810, 816 (8th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1107 , 125 S.Ct. 1010 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kanatzar
v.
United States
04-6088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2005.
543 U.S. 1107
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

543 U.S. 1107

KANATZAR
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 04-6088.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 24, 2005.

1

C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 810; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.