green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964 (10th Cir.2004) (“The scope of this stop was ... permissibly expanded when police smelled ... marijuana in the vehicle.”), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1082 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2005), reinstated, 410 F.3d 1186 (10th Cir.2005); United States v. Wilson, 96 Fed.Appx. 640, 644 (10th Cir.2004) (detection of alcohol on driver’s breath gives rise to reasonable suspicion).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nichols
(2×)
See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 961 (10th Cir.2004), vacated by 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1082 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2005) (hereinafter “Nichols I”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goncalves
See United States v. Dale, 374 F.3d 321, 330 (5th Cir. 2004), rev’d on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goncalves
See United States v. Dale, 374 F.3d 321, 330 (5th Cir.2004), rev’d on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1067 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1051 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyner
See United States v. Davis, 107 Fed.Appx. 596, 600 (6th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1073 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1055 (2005) (“[Bjecause Davis pleaded guilty to involvement in a drug conspiracy, the district court was authorized to consider the drug quantities that she personally distributed as well as any amounts that she reasonably could have foreseen her coconspir-ators would distribute.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Osamor
See Osamor v. Unit *410 ed States, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1070 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1053 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quinones
See United States v. Mincey, 380 F.3d 102, 105-06 (2d Cir.2004) (declining to construe Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to mandate invalidation of federal Sentencing Guidelines in the absence of further guidance from the Supreme Court), vacated sub nom., Ferrell v. United States, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1071 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1053 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moore
See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 965 (10th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds 543 U.S. 1113 (2005), conviction reinstated 410 F.3d 1186 (2005) (2-second rule); United States v. Vercher, 358 F.3d 1257, 1261-62 (10th Cir. 2004) (car-length standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Riolo v. United States
United States, 983 F.3d 651 , 668 n.13 (3d Cir. 2020); United States v. Collins, 361 F.3d 343, 348 (7th Cir. 2004) (“[W]hen it walks and talks like a financial insti- tution, even if it’s a phony one, it is . . . covered by [the Guideline].” (quoting United States v Randy, 81 F.3d 65, 69 (7th Cir. 1996)(em- phasis in original)); see also United States v. Dale, 374 F.3d 321 , 328–330 (5th Cir. 2004) (affirming application of the financial insti- tution guideline to a fraudulent entity the panel characterized as a “Ponzi scheme”), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). 10 Bu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hoffecker
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Collins concluded that “when it walks and talks like a financial institution, even if it is a phony one, it is . . . covered by § 2F1.1(b)(6).” 361 F.3d 343, 348 (7th Cir. 2004) (quoting United States v. Randy, 81 F.3d 65, 69 (7th Cir. 1996) (emphasis in original)); see also United States v. Dale, 374 F.3d 321, 328 (5th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1067 (2004) (agreeing with Collins decision that an illegitimate financial institution constitutes 7 Of course, Hoffecker’s activities here in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hoffecker
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Collins concluded that “when it walks and talks like a financial institution, even if it is a phony one, it is ... covered by § 2F1.1(b)(6).” 361 F.3d 343, 348 (7th Cir.2004) (quoting United States v. Randy, 81 F.3d 65, 69 (7th Cir.1996) (emphasis in original)); see also United States v. Dale, 374 F.3d 321, 328 (5th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 , 125 S.Ct. 1067 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1051 (2005) (agreeing with Collins decision that an illegitimate financial institution constitutes a financial institution for pur…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastwood, AKA Springer
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-7342.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2005.
Published
EASTWOOD, AKA SPRINGER
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-7342.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 24, 2005.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 107 Fed. Appx. 808; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.