green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Romo v. State
See Stauffer v. State, No. 14-03-00193-CR, 2004 WL 253520 , at *3 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 12, 2004, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication) (relying on Rodriguez and holding that drug dog’s alert outside the garage area of the home provided probable cause to search), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1151 , 125 S.Ct. 1326 , 161 L.Ed.2d 114 (2005); Smith, 2004 WL 213395 , at *5 (“Because the drug-dog’s positive alert for drugs was alone sufficient to establish probable cause for the search, we need not address the other allegations stated in the affidavit.”) (citation omitted); Por…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O’Hanian
v.
California
v.
California
04-823.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2005.
Published
App. Div., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.