yellow
Treated with caution
-0.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States
But see Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Though “we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 [ 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 ] (1994), we nevertheless recognize that Vords are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 151, 157 , 93 S.Ct. 408 , 34 L.Ed.2d 375 (1972))), reh’g and reh’g …
discussed
Cited "but see"
Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United States
But see Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Though ‘we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 , 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994), we nevertheless recognize that “words are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 151, 157 , 93 S.Ct. 408 , 34 L.Ed.2d 375 (1972))), reh’g and reh’g…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United States
Hall v. United States, 544 U.S. 913 , 125 S.Ct. 1606 , 161 L.Ed.2d 293 (2005); but see Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Though ‘we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 [ 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 ] (1994), we nevertheless recognize that “words are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States…
discussed
Cited "but see"
GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. United States
Hall v. United States, 544 U.S. 913 , 125 S.Ct. 1606 , 161 L.Ed.2d 293 (2005); but see Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir. 2004) (“Though ‘we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 , 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994), we nevertheless recognize that ‘words are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’ ” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United State…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. Wilson
Ct. 1669, 161 L.Ed.2d 481 (2005), “[t]he plain language of the statute therefore requires a plaintiff alleging circumvention (or trafficking) to prove that the defendant’s access was unauthorized.” 6 In the second amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that Wilson circumvented copyright protections on the GZM website on two occasions: (1) on August 10, 2009, when Wilson used the security access code to log in to the GZM website and deleted or hid GZM files or folders, and (2) on September 13, 2009, when Wilson allegedly circumvented the technological measures to gain access to the website …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chamberlain Group, Inc.
v.
Skylink Technologies, Inc
v.
Skylink Technologies, Inc
04-997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 2005.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC.
v.
SKYLINK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
No. 04-997.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 2005.
1
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 381 F. 3d 1178.