Scherrer v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California, 544 U.S. 951 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Scherrer v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California, 544 U.S. 951 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times, Aplt (pa, 2015-11-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times, Aplt
Pa. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Norton v. Glenn, 580 Pa. 212, 226 , 860 A.2d 48, 56 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 956 , 125 S.Ct. 1700 (2005) (acknowledging the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated public officials are required to prove actual malice as a prerequisite to establishing liability in defamation actions).6 Following New York Times, the U.S. Supreme Court struggled with whether and how the New York Times standard should apply to private individuals.7 In Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U.S. 29 , 91 S.Ct. 1811 (1971) (plurality opinion), abrogated by Gertz, supra, the Court, in separate opinions each garnering …
discussed Cited "see" Manning v. WPXI, INC. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lewis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 833 A.2d 185, 190 (Pa.Super.2003), appeal denied, 577 Pa. 690 , 844 A.2d 553 (2004). ¶ 4 Initially, I note that Manning concedes that he is a public official. [1] To survive summary judgment, Manning, as a public official, must not only come forward with evidence to show that the statements were false, see, e.g., Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily News, 577 Pa. 598, 621 , 848 A.2d 113, 127-128 (2004), but he must also present evidence from which a jury could reasonably conclude that the evidence clearly and convincingly shows Appellees acted with actual m…
discussed Cited "see" Vivian Wolfe-Holmes v. AR State Hospital
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Thomson Corp., 383 F.3d 789, 790-91 (8th Cir.2004) (per curiam) (Title VII claims are untimely unless filed within 90 days of right-to-sue letter), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1701 , 161 L.Ed.2d 529 (2005); Jackson v. Homechoice, Inc., 368 F.3d 997, 999 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (limitation period for § 1981 claims is four years); Egerdahl v. Hibbing Cmty. Coll., 72 F.3d 615, 618-19 (8th Cir.1995) (in absence of consent, Eleventh Amendment immunity bars equal protection claim brought under § 1981 against state or one of its agencies); Garrison v. Int’l Paper Co.,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scherrer
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
04-8221.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 2005.
544 U.S. 951
Published

544 U.S. 951

SCHERRER
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 04-8221.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 28, 2005.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.