green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Teamsters Local 97 v. State of New Jersey
See Hall v. Virginia, 385 F.3d 421 , 424 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004) (noting that the court can consider publicly available statistics on Virginia Division of Legislative Services' official website), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S. Ct. 1725 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Teamsters Local 97 v. State of New Jersey
See Hall v. Virginia, 385 F.3d 421 , 424 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004) (noting that the court can consider publicly available statistics on Virginia Division of Legislative Services' official website), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S. Ct. 1725 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Teamsters Local 97 v. State of New Jersey
See Hall v. Virginia, 385 F.3d 421 , 424 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004) (noting that the court can consider publicly available statistics on Virginia Division of Legislative Services' official website), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S. Ct. 1725 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartlett v. Strickland
See Hall, 385 F.3d, at 427-430 (C.A.4 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 602 (2005); Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School Dist., 168 F.3d 848, 852-853 (C.A.5 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000); Cousin v. Sundquist, 145 F.3d 818, 828-829 (C.A.6 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1138 , 119 S.Ct. 1026 , 143 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); Sanchez v. Colorado, 97 F.3d 1303, 1311-1312 (C.A.10 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1229 , 117 S.Ct. 1820 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997); Romero v. Pomona, 883 F.2d 1418 , 1424, n. 7, 1425-1426 (C.A.9 198…
discussed
Cited "see"
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Protection
(2×)
See Maldonado v. Harris, 370 F.3d 945, 955 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied 544 U.S. 968, 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 615 (2005) ("We join the Fourth Circuit in expressing serious doubts that a facial challenge under the First Amendment can ever be barred by a statute of limitations.” (citing Nat'l Adver.
cited
Cited "see"
Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of Architects
See Holloway v. Arkansas State Bd. of Architects, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pender County v. Bartlett
(2×)
See, e.g., Hall v. Virginia, 385 F.3d 421 , 423 (4th Cir.2004) (holding " Gingles establishes a numerical majority requirement for all Section 2 claims"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 961 , 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 602 (2005); Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Indep.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philadelphia Housing Authority
v.
Williams
v.
Williams
04-873.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
v.
WILLIAMS ET AL.
No. 04-873.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 4, 2005.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 380 F. 3d 751.