green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Coulter
The facts of this case bear no resemblance whatsoever to those post-Crawford cases in which the Federal courts have found "testimonial hearsay.” See, e.g., United States v. Gilbert, 391 F.3d 882, 884 (7th Cir.2004)(concluding that statements made by the defendant's wife during recorded telephone conversations with police officers were testimonial); United States v. Rodriguez-Marrero, 390 F.3d 1, 17 (1st Cir.2004)(finding a signed confession given under oath to a prosecutor in Puerto Rico to be testimonial hearsay), ce rt. denied, 544 U.S. 912 , 125 S.Ct. 1620 , 161 L.Ed.2d 292 (2005); United…
cited
Cited "see"
Morrow v. Ignacio
See Parle v. Runnels, 387 F.3d 1030, 1045 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1041 , 125 S.Ct. 2274 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1073 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent G. Williams
See United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1297 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2279 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1074 (2005); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1335 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 416 , — L.Ed.2d — (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Willihnganz
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Knickmeier, 2004 WI 115 , 275 Wis. 2d 69 , 683 N.W.2d 445 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1041 (2005); In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Urban, 2002 WI 63 , 253 Wis. 2d 194 , 645 N.W.2d 612 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta Riley
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Knickmeier, 2004 WI 115 , 275 Wis. 2d 69 , 683 N.W.2d 445 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1041 (2005); In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Urban, 2002 WI 63 , 253 Wis. 2d 194 , 645 N.W.2d 612 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. St. Anne Narcisse
We have held that "the right to appeal a sentence based on Apprendi/Booker grounds can be waived in a plea agreement.” United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1335 (11th Cir.2005), pet. for cert. filed, (U.S. June 7, 2005) (No. 04-1663); see also United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1295-96 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2279 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1074 (2005) (concluding that "the general appeal-waiver language of the plea agreement [was] broad enough to include an Apprendi/Blakely/Booker claim”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patrick
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-9586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2005.
Published
PATRICK
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-9586.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 16, 2005.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx. 385.