green
Positive treatment
Trending · 95 recent citers
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. John O.
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Orona v. State
(2×)
See Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 114 (Tex.Crim.App.2004), cer t. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005); see also Wall v. State, 184 S.W.3d 730 , 735 & n. 11 (Tex.Crim.App.2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Woods v. Rick Thaler, Director
See Woods v. Texas, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. NASHEED
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lavigne
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leblanc v. United States
See Weiner v. United States, 389 F.3d 152, 155 (5th Cir.2004), ce rt. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2312 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2005); Mellina v. United States, 518 F.Supp.2d 825, 828-29 (N.D.Tex.2007); see also Schell v. United States, 84 Fed.Cl. 159, 167-68 (2008); Prati, 81 Fed.Cl. at 436 ; Keener, 76 Fed.Cl. at 463-64 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. THOMAS W.
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Randall v. State
See Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 114-15 (Tex.Crim.App.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lamantia
It further explained that § 53a-151(a)"applies only to conduct intentionally undertaken to undermine the veracity of the testimony given by a witness." Id., at 672 , 513 A.2d 646 ; see also State v. Coleman , 83 Conn. App. 672 , 678-79, 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2290 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State
P. 44.2(b), 47.1; see also Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 118 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (stating that the erroneous admission of an appellant's statement in violation of article 38.22 amounts to non-constitutional error), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. State
(2×)
P. 47.1; see also Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 118 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (stating that the erroneous admission of an appellant’s statement in violation of article 38.22 amounts to nonconstitutional error), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 686-87 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rangel v. State
(2×)
Crawford, 541 U.S. at 68 , 124 S.Ct. at 1374 ; see also Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (recognizing Crawford *533 drew a distinction between testimonial and non-testimonial statements), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005); Wilson v. State, 151 S.W.3d 694, 697-98 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref'd) (noting the threshold question is whether statement is testimonial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rangel v. State
Crawford, 541 U.S. at 68 , 124 S.Ct. at 1374 ; see also Woods v. State, 152 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (recognizing Crawford *533 drew a distinction between testimonial and non-testimonial statements), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2295 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1092 (2005); Wilson v. State, 151 S.W.3d 694, 697-98 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref'd) (noting the threshold question is whether statement is testimonial).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woods
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
04-9190.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
WOODS
v.
TEXAS.
No. 04-9190.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 23, 2005.
1
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 152 S. W. 3d 105.