green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bradley v. Lang
(Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not remedied the deficiencies noted, nor filed anything 22 further on the docket. 23 1 “To qualify for in forma pauperis status, a civil litigant must demonstrate both that the 2 litigant is unable to pay court fees and that the claims he or she seeks to pursue are not 3 frivolous.” Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App’x 522, 523 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1051 4 (2005).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
“To qualify for 20 in forma pauperis status, a civil litigant must demonstrate both that the litigant is unable 21 to pay court fees and that the claims he or she seeks to pursue are not frivolous.” 22 Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App’x 522, 523 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1051 23 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cummings
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
04-9228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 2005.
Published
CUMMINGS
v.
ILLINOIS.
No. 04-9228.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 23, 2005.
1
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 351 Ill. App. 3d 343, 813 N. E. 2d 1004.