green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“o governing precedent of the supreme court or court of appeals decision ... holds that a person was in custody after being clearly advised of his freedom to leave or terminate questioning.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jimenez-Robles
o governing precedent of the supreme court or court of appeals decision ... holds that a person was in custody after being clearly advised of his freedom to leave or terminate questioning.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sirhan v. Galaza
See People v. Coffman, 34 Cal.4th 1, 106-107 , 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 710 , 96 P.3d 30 (2004) (explaining that an aider and abettor is guilty of both the offense he intended to facilitate or encourage and also of any reasonably foreseeable offense committed by the person he aids and abets), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2517 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005); see also People v. Sanchez, 26 Cal.4th 834, 845-849 , 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 129 , 29 P.3d 209 (2001) (explaining that it is proximate causation, not actual causation, together with the requisite mental state (i.e., malice) that determines a defendant…
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Lamas
See Lambert v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 210, 233-34 (3d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2516 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. May
United States v. Griffin, 922 F.2d 1343, 1349 (8th Cir.1990); see United States v. Czichray, 378 F.3d 822, 827 (8th Cir.2004), cert. denied 544 U.S. 1060, 125 S.Ct. 2514 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1109 (2005); United States v. Axsom, 289 F.3d 496, 500, 501 (8th Cir.2002). *1027 The Court has regarded the first three of the Griffin factors as mitigative in their effect upon the ultimate determination, for the presence, during questioning, of one or more of those factors would tend to weigh against a finding of custody.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Marvin Cox, III
See United States v. Drury, 396 F.3d 1303, 1315 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 336 , 163 L.Ed.2d 48 (2005). “[W]hen employing an abuse-of-discretion standard, we must affirm unless we find that the district court has made a clear error of judgment, or has applied the wrong legal standard.” United States v. Frazier, 387 F.3d 1244, 1259 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2516 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Lee Ollie, Jr.
See United States v. Czichray, 378 F.3d 822, 826 (8th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1060 , 125 S.Ct. 2514 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1109 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Lee Ollie, Jr
See United States v. Czichray, 378 F.3d 822, 826 (8th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 2514 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Junior Frazier
See United States v. Frazier, 387 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir.2004) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2516 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brandon
See United States v. DiGiacomo, supra, 579 F.2d 1214 ; United States v. Blakey, supra, 294 F. Supp. 3d 494 ; see also, e.g., United States v. Czichray, 378 F.3d 822, 825 (8th Cir. 2004) (threats of arrest are relevant to custody analysis), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1060 , 125 S. Ct. 2514 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robidoux v. O'BRIEN
Compare Wilson v. Workman, 577 F.3d 1284, 1292 (10th Cir.2009) (en banc), and Taylor v. Maddox, 366 F.3d 992, 1001 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1038 , 125 S.Ct. 809 , 160 L.Ed.2d 605 (2004), with Lambert v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 210 , 238 (3d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2516 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005), and Mendiola v. Schomig, 224 F.3d 589, 592-93 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 949 , 121 S.Ct 2591 , 150 L.Ed.2d 750 (2001). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See, e.g., People v. Coffman, 34 Cal.4th 1 , 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 710, 763-65 , 96 P.3d 30, 56-57 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2517 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005); State v. Rags-dale, 276 Wis.2d 52 , 687 N.W.2d 785, 789-90 (Wis.Ct.App.2004), review denied by 276 Wis.2d 30 , 689 N.W.2d 57 (2004); State v. Betances, 265 Conn. 493 , 828 A.2d 1248, 1256-57 (Conn.2003); Thomas v. State, 128 Md.App. 274 , 737 A.2d 622, 632 (Md.Ct.App.1999); Benson v. State, 698 So.2d 333, 335-37 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1997); State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 124 , 871 P.2d 237, 245 (Ariz. 1994); State v. Provost, 4…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hackett
v.
Folino, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene
v.
Folino, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene
04-7990.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 2005.
Cited by 39 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
HACKETT
v.
FOLINO, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE, ET AL.
No. 04-7990.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 31, 2005.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 381 F. 3d 281.