green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Indigo Williams v. Tate Reeves
One, 149 F.3d 1177, at *4 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (quoting Papasan, 478 U.S. at 279 ) (holding that several of plaintiffs’ causes of action sought, “at least on their face, prospective declaratory or injunctive relief for a continuing violation of federal law,” and were therefore permissible under Ex parte Young).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell
See, e.g., Digges v. Jeffcoat, 149 F.3d 1177 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (holding that Heck barred claims attacking “false disciplinary charges,” but distinguishing these claims from “retaliation claim,” which was not subject to Heck); Sherman v. Quintanilla, 149 F.3d 1173 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell
See, e.g., Digges v. Jeffcoat, 149 F.3d 1177 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (holding that Heck barred claims attacking “false disciplinary charges,” but distinguishing these claims from “retaliation claim,” which was not subject to Heck); Sherman v. Quintanilla, 149 F.3d 1173 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Hanna v. Delmer Maxwell
(2×)
See, e.g., Digges v. Jeffcoat, 149 F.3d 1177 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (holding that Heck barred claims attacking “false disciplinary charges,” but distinguishing these claims from “retaliation claim,” which was not subject to Heck); Sherman v. Quintanilla, 149 F.3d 1173 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eason
v.
Johnson[*]
NO. 96-21152
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
June 24, 1998
Appeal From: S.D.Tex. ,No.H96CV2025
1
Affirmed.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2